Kaelus is making every effort to ensure customers and partners have access to important information regarding our business and the products and services we offer. The following "frequently asked questions" have been prepared to answer many of the common questions you may have. If you have additional questions please contact your existing business contact.

FAQs for Suppliers

FAQs for Customers

PIM FAQs

Combiner FAQs

TMA FAQs

FAQs for Suppliers

Yes! We value our supplier relationships and anticipate no changes in this area of the business.

There will be no immediate change. Continue to work with your current contacts. You will be contacted directly should there be changes in the future.

Please continue to send your invoices to the same address you have been using. You will receive specific instructions when our legal names are amended.

No, there is no change in payment terms for suppliers. Payment terms are provided on all purchase orders.

FAQs for Customers

No. We will be able to trade under the legacy names for a transition period.

As timing will vary for each region, please reach out to your current contacts for more information.

Changing the name is all about growth. We are not planning to close any existing manufacturing locations.

Not at this time, however we may review this again in the future.

PIM FAQs

Through interaction with engineers and technicians in many countries throughout the world, Kaelus has had the opportunity to discuss and evaluate measurement techniques as they apply to a wide variety of scenarios. We have discussed the problem of IM with component manufacturers, infrastructure providers, site managers and service providers. This list of "Frequently Asked Questions" is an attempt to consolidate the information we've gathered into one convenient location.

Passive IM, similar to Active IM but occurring in passive devices, is present whenever RF signals at two or more frequencies are simultaneously present in a conductor of RF energy. Every passive RF device generates passive IM products when more than one frequency is present in the device. The signals are mixed by the non-linear properties of junctions between dissimilar materials. Typically, it is the odd-ordered products (e.g. IM3=2*F1-F2) that can be very problematic should they fall within an uplink, or receive band of the base station because they appear to the receiver as interference. The result can be a receiver desensitization which is independent of the receiver's random noise floor.

In RF components (antennas, cables, filters, etc.), there are typically three causes:

  1. Poor mechanical junctions in the RF path
  2. RF components fabricated with materials which exhibit some level of hysteresis (e.g., stainless steel)
  3. Contaminated surfaces or contacts within the RF path. Examples might include flux (which can attract other contaminants) and metallic particles from the machining process.

In integrated base stations, significant levels of passive IM can be generated within any of the passive components between the high power amplifiers and the receiver filter. Passive IM can also be generated on the tower ("rusty bolt noise") or by nearby metallic objects in the direct beam of the transmit antenna.

This annotation is commonly used to specify the order of the IM product being discussed. The IM stands for "intermodulation." The numeric value that follows is the sum of the integer multipliers used for each of the two parent tones to realize the given IM product. This is best understood by reviewing the following table:

IM Calculation IM Order
2*F1 ± 1*F2 = FIM3 Third Order (2+1=IM3)
3*F1 ± 2*F2 = FIM5 Fifth Order (3+2=IM5)
4*F1 ± 3*F2 = FIM7 Seventh Order (4+3=IM7)
5*F1 ± 4*F2 = FIM9 Ninth Order (5+4=IM9)

Most commonly, the lower order tones are of the largest magnitude. However, in frequency-selective systems, it is possible that an IM5 product might actually appear larger to the receiver than an IM3 product.

The required PIM performance for a given RF device is a strong function of where that device is located in the final system. For example, an antenna must have excellent PIM performance as the PIM generated in the antenna is both received and radiated by the base station. Further, the transmit antenna is subjected to nearly the full carrier power of the base station. On the other hand, the PIM performance of a receive "clean-up" filter need not be so stringent. This filter might be located on the other side of a diplexer thus preventing the full carrier power level from reaching its input connector.

Ultimately, it is up to the buyer to specify the maximum acceptable PIM level and carrier power levels. Commonly seen specifications for antennas are -100 to -110dBm IM3 levels with two, +43dBm (20 Watt) per carrier tones.

Yes. However, the relationship between the generated PIM power level and the parent carrier power levels is not always straightforward.
In simple, broadband devices terminated into a broadband termination, the IM3 response typically increases approximately 3 dB for every one dB in carrier power level (assuming equal carrier powers). However, there are many factors which tend to work against this nice, simple relationship. These include:

  • High return loss values at n*F1 and/or m*F2
  • Extreme slope variations on the hysteresis curves associated with ferrite devices
  • Non-Linear behavior of electromechanical junctions as they approach a breakdown potential
  • The interaction of multiple IM sources as the impedance of each IM source changes with incident power level

In general, as the transmitter power increases, the importance of PIM on the overall system performance becomes of increasing concern. As a TDMA system fills available frequency and time channel slots, or as a CDMA system increases forward power levels to increase capacity, PIM levels typically increase.

It depends. One postulate is that a single IM source which is located at a single point (not spatially distributed) and is matched in impedance to the incident transmission line (or source of stimulus RF energy) generates frequency-independent IM isotropically. This is the analog of the classical "Point Source" of RF in antenna theory.

Given that this point source of PIM exists (at least theoretically), real-world RF devices can be modeled as being comprised of multiple PIM sources. These sources generate IM which has a phase relationship with the parent RF carriers. Once the PIM is generated at each point source within the device, the PIM signals themselves can vectorially combine (either constructively or destructively) to produce a composite PIM response. The phase relationship between the PIM sources will depend upon their physical separation, the dielectric through which the RF must travel between the sources, and the frequency of the parent carriers.

Given that all real world devices have more than one source of PIM, it is quite probable that the device will have a frequency-dependent PIM response. However,

  • if the device is electrically small, or
  • if the bandwidth of interest is relatively small compared to the device under test, or
  • if the device is dominated by a single, large IM source the measured frequency response may appear frequency independent.

Even though electrically long (more than one-half wavelength) cables can have a frequency-dependent PIM response in the reverse direction, the periodicity of the ripple can quite often be related directly to the electrical length of the cable assembly. Yes, the cable PIM response is frequency dependent. However, if the cable assembly PIM is measured across a swept-frequency bandwidth that includes both peaks and nulls, the worst-case combination of PIM sources can be captured across the test band.

So long as the individual sources of PIM do not change in magnitude dramatically with frequency, and so long as the loss of the cable assembly does not change appreciably with frequency, there is a good change that the PIM results measured at 1800 MHz will be representative of the performance expected at 900 MHz.

This topic does bring up an interesting note, however. As the carrier frequencies increase, the RF skin depth on the conductors of the device-under-test tends to decrease. For equal carrier powers, the current density at 1800 MHz will be higher than at 900 MHz. For this reason, testing a cable at 900 MHz may produce a PIM result which is better than the results which might be obtained if the same cable were tested at 1800 MHz.

The bottom line is as follows: To be absolutely certain of the PIM level for a cable assembly in a given band, you should test in that band. To characterize the approximate performance of a cable assembly (or the integrity of the mechanical connector-cable interfaces), testing in one band will most likely yield results which are representative of the overall cable performance.

Passive IM is typically specified in absolute power (units of dBm) or power relative to only one of the test tones (units of dBc). For example, a -110dBm IM signal caused by two +43dBm tones is also specified as a -153dBc IM level. In the case of unequal carrier power levels, Summitek Instruments has established the convention that units of dBc are relative to the largest of the incident carriers.

It is important to note that a carrier power level must always be specified with the given PIM performance level. This applies equally to PIM performance specified in units of dBm and dBc.

There is a clear distinction between random noise floor (kTBF) and the "PIM Noise Floor." The latter is more accurately restated as "Residual IM Level". Each of these two parameters are discussed below:

The noise floor of the PIM test system is typically defined as the mean value of the measured signal when the receiver is terminated into 50 Ohms and the RF is turned off. If there is a coupling mechanism for noise from the high power amplifiers to appear in the receiver, this source of noise must also be included in the noise floor test. Noise is random and is typically due to a combination of phase noise in the local oscillator, kTBF noise from the receiver's pre-amplifier(s), and noise from the transmitter. The noise floor of a PIM test receiver (or spectrum analyzer/LNA combination) typically varies from approximately -120dBm to -140dBm depending upon the selected averaging level (or resolution bandwidth). You cannot make a meaningful IM measurement at a level below the noise floor of the receiver.

The residual IM level of the analyzer is caused by internally generated IM within the analyzer's cabling, internal connectors, filters, and duplexers. This level is typically larger than the noise floor of the receiver for the third-order IM product (IM3). When an IM measurement is performed on a DUT whose true IM level is near that of the analyzer, significant measurement errors can occur. This is because the residual IM of the analyzer vectorially combines with the true IM of the device-under-test thus producing a measurement with a high uncertainty level. The residual IM level of a test system can be reduced through the use of high-quality diplexers, filters, and carefully constructed, Low-PIM interconnecting cables.

Note: Averaging (or reducing the resolution bandwidth of a spectrum analyzer) cannot reduce the residual IM level. Averaging is only useful in reducing the level of the receiver noise floor. For the most efficient measurement time, and to maximize the test system's responsiveness to transient PIM, use only enough averaging (or use the widest possible resolution bandwidth) to maintain the receiver noise floor at least 10 dB below the expect minimum PIM level.

Possibly.

Two types of PIM generation are typically found. The first type is of a "burst" nature and is commonly associated with the periodic breakdown of poor mechanical junctions exposed to high RF power levels. With this type of PIM, the IM will appear as a short (less than 1 second) burst of broadband, noise-like energy. On some devices and systems, these bursts have been measured at random intervals from 2 or 3 seconds to several hours.

The second type of PIM generation is more steady state, and coherent in nature. RF heating within RF conductors and around RF interfaces can causes minute changes in the contact integrity. The result is a PIM level which changes with time. A classic example of this can be found by measuring the PIM from a cable assembly which is poorly constructed or has been subjected to mechanical stress. The PIM performance of the cable assembly may appear quite good at first, only to degrade as the assembly heats up. Interesting enough, the opposite has been found to happen. The cable assembly is poor at first, but as the RF heating causes the mechanical interfaces to expand (and compress), the PIM performance improves with time.

Consider an operational and fielded base station. Wind, Rain, and Sun-induced thermal cycling are all at work to continuously stress the mechanical interfaces within the antenna, the cable assemblies, and the connections to the shelter. As the sun rises and heats the RF connections, the PIM levels can rise (or fall) if the cables, connectors, and antennas are not functioning properly. The result can be increased levels of IM only at certain times of the day.

Because the intermodulation signals created at various PIM sources within an assembly are vectorial in nature, their relative phase relationships will determine the overall magnitude of (scalar) PIM measured at a particular location in a Device Under Test. Using the model developed in the application note Measuring the Passive Intermodulation Performance of RF Cable Assemblies, we find that all the IM responses arrive in-phase at Port 2 of a through IM measurement, independent of the IM frequency, while the reflected IM response present at Port 1 is a combination of the Port 1 response plus a phase-shifted response from the IM sources at Port 2. Because there is a vector combination of IM sources with differing phases, it is expected that the reflected IM response is a function of both frequency and the electrical length of the assembly.

In the real world, however, the forward IM response may not measure as being frequency independent and may not be the worst-case IM response. This is due to differences between the real world and the very simple model used in the above reference. Using more complex models which account for complex impedances and losses at not only the IM frequencies, but also at the harmonics of the carrier frequencies is a step forward towards more accurately predicting the results of a passive IM measurement.

Because the phase of the individual sources of IM within a device-under-test is related to the phase of the parent carriers, changing the carrier frequencies will change the phase relationship of the PIM signals. Depending upon where the composite PIM response is measured, the resulting composite PIM level may change as the carrier frequencies are changed.

Not if you are testing with two tones. When two carrier tones are used, the relative rate of phaser rotation between the carriers is determined by the frequency separation. The carriers will periodically combine in and then out of phase at a fixed rate for the given frequency separation. Phase locking the carriers together will force the carriers to cross at a known instant in time, relative to the phase of one of the carriers. However, this won't impact the magnitude of the generated PIM levels.

If three or more carriers are utilized for testing, the phase of the third carrier now becomes important. By phase locking the three carriers together, and adjusting their relative phases, a specific phase point on the third carrier can be made to align with a known phase crossing point of the first two carriers. This could be used, for example, to establish a worst-case current density at a set of fixed frequencies at a specific point within the device-under-test.

Whether you are using 2, 3, or 100 carriers to perform PIM testing, it is good practice to connect the clocks together to minimize the impact of RF frequency drift on the measurement. This is especially important if you are using a very narrow receiver to perform the PIM testing.

When measuring PIM with a 2-tone test, there is only one IM response of each order which is of interest. This is in contrast to a 16-tone PIM measurement. In this case, there is a "picket-fence" of, say, IM3 responses to choose from displayed on the spectrum analyzer. Depending upon the characteristics of the device- under-test, the picket-fence may be flat, or have a more complex shape. Typically, the largest of the observed responses which is reported as the device's PIM level.

The 16-tone test has the advantage of allowing the device's PIM frequency response to be observed in a single measurement. This same frequency response display is obtained with the Summitek Instruments Passive IM Analyzer (or other computer-controlled PIM systems) by sweeping the carriers across a pre-defined band, much the same as a conventional network analysis measurement.

Comparing the 16-tone and 2-tone measurement results is a difficult task. Some users have reported the swept 2-tone test is much more difficult to pass, while others say the 16-tone test is more rigorous. As results from comparison testing become available, Summitek Instruments will continue to update this FAQ.

Ultimately, it is the performance of the integrated base station that is important. Although most wireless transmit and receive frequency bands are carefully selected to avoid landing the largest IM products within the receive band, self-generated higher order products (IM5, 7, 9) do land within some communication bands. More frequently, IM products from a nearby (or co-located) competitor's site can become troublesome sources of interference.

To the receiver, PIM products appear as interference. Once the PIM power level rises above the random (kTBF) noise floor of the receiver, the system C/I becomes adversely impacted. Because PIM products typically increase significantly as the average transmit power level increases, the impact of PIM on a base station may only become significant when the base station becomes fully loaded. Just when the most capacity is needed, passive IM level can rise up and interfere with normal base station operation.

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has formed a Technical Committee (TC46/WG6). The assigned task of this committee is as follows:

"To prepare test methods and to investigate relevant limits, for Passive Intermodulation in the RF and microwave frequency range for passive components (i.e. connectors, cables, cable assemblies, waveguide assemblies and components...). To closely liaise with TC 102 for matters relevant to antennas and with SC 48B for connectors with respect to PIM. To liaise with other relevant committees, subcommittees, working groups, organizations and individuals, in order to ensure the widest appropriate awareness of, and the greatest relevant participation in and contribution to the work being carried out."

This group has been meeting for several years, and the first release of a standards document is imminent. Contact the IEC http://www.iec.ch for additional information or to obtain a copy of this document when it becomes available.

Combiner FAQs

The jumper pin blocks are used to route DC and AISG (2.176MHz carrier) signals from the Base Station/RRU on the RF cable center conductor up the tower, or to the antenna where they can be used to power and communicate/control with Tower Mounted Amplifiers (TMA’s) and/or Antennas.  Consult the Combiner data sheet for proper connections.

Kaelus recommends the extra pin blocks in the baggie be removed during unpackaging and saved by the installer/contractor to use in the event of a shortage/need in another sector, or at another site.

More isolation does not necessarily translate into better radio system performance.  For modern 3G and 4G radios, it has been our experience that a minimum of 30dB isolation between radios is necessary to prevent interference.

Absolutely!  Kaelus combiners are bi-directional, and can pass both transmit and receive signals, whether being used as a combiner or splitter.

DC Autosense switching capable products monitor voltage at each combiner input port and based upon a predetermined priority switching table (per product data sheet), will route DC and AISG signals from the highest priority port through to the common port that has DC voltage present.  AISG carrier signal does not have to be present to allow switching as DC Autosense switching relies upon DC voltage for switching logic decisions.

Kaelus Combiners can be either pole or wall mounted, placed in any orientation except with breather element pointing up (towards sky).  If installed outdoors it is always recommend to wrap connectors with mastic tape or other means to prevent environmental ingress.  Please consult Kaelus Installation Instructions for further details.

Kaelus Combiners contain a ground lug on either one or both of the mounting feet.  It is strongly recommended to install a cable from Combiner ground lug to low impedance tower/system earth ground system.  Please consult Kaelus Installation Instructions for further details.

TMA FAQs

The TMA improves system uplink performance through use of a low noise amplifier (LNA) which establishes the system receive noise figure at the TMA despite the several dB’s of cable loss after the TMA.  The TMA is most beneficial to system performance improvement with longer feeder cable lengths, however system improvement can also be obtained for shorter cable lengths.  For detailed information on the importance and benefits through the use of TMA’s, please access Kaelus White Paper Network Coverage at its Best: http://www.kaelus.com/getmedia/a3cbf50e-032c-4e47-95b7-f1b06bdcbee4/Network-Coverage-at-its-Best.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf

The DC power for operating a TMA comes from the feeder cable center conductor which typically contains DC power and 2.176MHz AISG signals.  The BTS or RRH impresses the DC voltage and AISG signals onto the feeder cable.

All Kaelus adjustable gain TMA’s are shipped from the factory at maximum gain (example: 13dB for a 3-13dB adjustable gain TMA).  The correct level of gain is that at which maximum noise figure improvement is obtained without loss of RRH/Receiver dynamic range for stronger uplink signals.  For sites with longer feeder cable runs this is almost always at maximum gain, however for shorter lengths of cables or when TMA is used as a Ground Mounted Amplifier (GMA) and is located closer to the RRH/Receiver, lower gain levels are usually needed to prevent loss of receiver dynamic range.

The Kaelus TMA will search for AISG carrier (2.176MHz) present at either BTS1 or BTS2 ports.  Once the carrier is recognized the TMA will enter AISG operation mode, with TMA parameters such as model number, frequency band(s) of operation, serial number, gain setting, bypass set and alarms will all be visible to user over the length of feeder cable assuming the user is using a smart bias tee/computer or can interface with RRH.  The user can see all Antenna Line Devices (ALD’s) including Antenna and TMA’s that are on the AISG bus.

Bypass mode can be manually set and gain can be set so long as the TMA is gain adjustable.

Yes, all Kaelus TMA’s will operate as specified with no AISG carrier present (current window alarm – CWA mode), but obviously obtaining TMA information and control via AISG bus is not possible.  For gain adjustable TMA’s the last gain level set via the AISG bus will be the operating gain level of the TMA until AISG connection can be again establish and gain changes made.


In AISG mode, the TMA will flag the alarm state and be visible by connected user (seen on AISG bus) and/or RRH will enter alarm state.  In CWA mode, the operating current will increase in alarm state.  Consult the product data sheet for CWA state input current specification. 

All Kaelus TMA’s have a circular 8-pin AISG connector than can be used to daisy chain to other AISG compliant Antenna Line Devices.  For example daisy chain cable from TMA to Antenna RET.  Most Kaelus TMA’s also are smart switching capable; meaning that DC and AISG signals will be switched from the TMA to designated Antenna port if the TMA senses that the antenna port is not a DC short and no current is being drawn from the 8-pin circular AISG connector.  Consult Kaelus Applications Engineering for further details.

Electrical damage can occur if RF signals are applied to the antenna port of the TMA within the uplink (receive) band that exceed the maximum input rating of the low noise amplifier – generally above levels of +10dBm.

All Kaelus TMA low noise amplifiers offer very high 3rd order intercept levels thus allowing for a very wide dynamic range of operation, even in the presence of strong co-located signals.  In addition, many Kaelus TMA’s also offer strong receive band preselect filters that provide rejection of co-located transmit signals for additional protection

Return Loss (RL) measures the quality of the matching of impedances between parts of a transmission system. The higher the RL, the better the match, and the lower the reflections. With a TMA we measure the Downlink RL (from BTS to Antenna), and the Uplink RL (from Antenna to BTS).  Uplink and Downlink return loss are measured at the BTS port with the Antenna port terminated, either into a 50 Ohm cable/antenna system or load.  

Downlink return loss will be fixed (it’s simply the Downlink bypass filter section), and will typically be equal to, or greater than 18 db.  Uplink return loss will depend on whether the TMA is powered or not. If the TMA is powered on, then the RL will be measuring both the LNA and the Uplink filters, and will typically be equal to, or greater than 18 db. If the TMA is not powered, then the RL will be measuring ONLY the Uplink filters (the LNA is bypassed), and will typically be between 3dB to 5dB lower than when powered is applied to the TMA. 

Insertion Loss (IL) measures the electrical power loss in the system.  The lower the IL, the more power that makes it from the Input part of the system to the output part of the system (and visa-versa).  Downlink IL is measured at the BTS port with the Antenna port terminated into a Short.

Gain (G) measures the increase in the Uplink RF signal level produced by the TMA’s amplifiers. To measure TMA gain requires a two port measurement and is not often done on site. The gain is measured by injecting a signal (of a known level, in dBm) at the Antenna port and measuring the level of the signal (in dBm) at the BTS port, and comparing the two. The difference in levels between the antenna port and the BTS port is the Gain of the TMA.

Measurement It is important to understand what the basic specifications are for the DUT.
Try to obtain the spec sheet for the TMA via the QR Code label, Kaelus website or through a sales/support channel.  You will need to know the frequency band of operation for both RX and TX paths.  Return loss, downlink insertion loss and uplink bypass loss measurements can be made with one port measurement device such as the Kaelus iVA Antenna and Cable Analyzer http://www.kaelus.com/en/test-measurement-solutions/cable-and-antenna-analyzers/iva-cable-antenna-analyzer.  Complete testing to include gain is not possible unless a two port transmission measurement is employed and the TMA is accessible at ground or roof level.

If no specs are available that’s ok, most TMA’s operate in a similar manner
Nominal TX filter path specs:
Insertion Loss: <1dB
Return Loss: >18dB

Nominal RX path specs LNA ON (Ensure output power of VNA is set to -20dBm or lower):
Insertion Loss (gain) nom: 12dB, +/-1.0dB
Return Loss: >18dB

Current draw is very specific to each model of TMA. 150-200mA is usually normal. A twin TMA will likely draw twice the current of a single TMA. Pay careful attention to how you connect the VNA for this measurement.  The signal is designed to pass from the antenna port to the BTS port. As you connect and disconnect the DC power, you should see the TMA go in and out of bypass mode.

Nominal RX path specs LNA OFF (Bypass Mode)
Insertion Loss: 3dB nominal
Return Loss /Loss: 15dB nominal

If all measurements are similar to the nominal values above, further investigation is required.  

A simple way to check for gain when TMA’s are on the tower:

Remove power from both feedlines for the sector you wish to test. Perform a transmission measurement between the two antenna cables in the RX band (measurement of the antenna isolation and the cable loss).  Normalize this measurement trace (data to mem, disp. Data/memory), which should cancel out the loss with some noise present. This step is not always necessary but it can help make a decent relative measurement.  Then apply power to the TMA feeding into the VNA, the difference in gain should be displayed.  Reverse VNA connections and power up the other path to test 2nd TMA.  This is the easiest way to check TMA gain from the ground.   Pay careful attention to your connections, TMA’s are directional.

Kaelus TMA’s can be either pole or wall mounted, placed in any orientation except with breather element pointing up (towards sky).  If installed outdoors it is always recommend to wrap connectors with mastic tape or other means to prevent environmental ingress.  Please consult Kaelus Installation Instructions for further details.

Kaelus TMA’s contain a ground lug on either one or both of the mounting feet.  It is strongly recommended to install a cable from the TMA ground lug to low impedance tower/system earth ground system.  Please consult Kaelus Installation Instructions for further details.